longthought's Profile

longthought On 8 months ago

About Me

  • Birthday: Jan 31, 1952
  • Gender: Male
  • Yahoo: longthought
  • Blog Traffic: 44,616 Visitors

Feingold For President

March 14, 2006 / by longthought

 Although Senator Feingold's attempt to censure President Bush, is bound for failure I give him an "A" for effort. It's about time a Democrat stood out amongst the sheep to speak his mind. I'm impressed with Fiengold for this reason and the fact that he and he alone stood up and voted AGAINST the Patriot Act when it first came to the Senate floor.
I'm looking forward to hearing more from this man in the following couple of years. As it stands right now today he has my vote. I was leaning towards McCain but he tossed himself out of contention when he came out in support of President Bush's Dubai Ports deal by saying something to the effect of we need to just trust the President on this issue. I felt he had finally sold himself out the GOP, a day late and a dollar short for Republicans and to soon for us independents.
   I hate to be a one or two issue person when making decisions on voting but it may come down to that when the issues are this big. If we have a chance to "UNDO" the Patriot Act I would vote for that person in a heart beat purely on that subject alone.

28 comments on Feingold For President

  • APOLITICALNUT said 2 years ago
    [SMILE] Not being facetious but I wish Feingold well. I hope the Democrats nominate a real liberal Democrat and not some wishy-washy pragmatist trying for the political center. We know what Feingold stands for. As far as I know there is no hint of scandal in his record. I hope the Republicans nominate a real conservative and the Democrats nominate a real liberal. Good luck with Russ Feingold!
  • longthought said 2 years ago
    Thank you. A true liberal vs. a true conservative that would be refreshing.[COOL][COOL]
  • jayjay244 said 2 years ago
    Being from Wisconsin, I can tell you that Feingold is an incredible talent and a true progressive. Last week, he held an on-line listening session. Anyone could ask him questions. He answered two questions that I proposed. He returns his Senate pay increase every year. He is the real deal. If every elected representative truly cared about truth and honesty like Feingold, this country would be a much different place.
  • voltaire said 2 years ago
    longthought:
    I applaud your comments on Feingold. Unfortunately, we do not have men of principle in American politics who are willing to take a stand against their party or administration.
    Paul Wellstone was a great example of one who did that when he voted against the war
    resolution and risked his election. But I do not know where you would find in either party a "true liberal" or a "true conservative." You would first have to define the terms. However, Feingold is one to consider for 2008, and another is Bill Richardson. Personally, a pox on both parties!
    voltaire[THUMBUP]
  • Strider333 said 2 years ago
    There's no scandal in Feingolds background what so ever. I happen to also be from Wisconsin and this guy is a maverick. And, I'm not sure you can tag him an exclusive liberal either, such as his Ashcroft vote that ticked off quite a few people. I respect his independent nature, he a smart guy no doubt but I'm not sure how electable he is. But right now, I admire his actions indeed.
  • JOEZsREPUBLICANPAGE said 2 years ago
    [OHMY][OHMY] GIVE ME A BREAK[TONGUE][TONGUE][TONGUE][TONGUE]
  • snacks said 2 years ago
    Someone had to raise his/her voice, and Feingold did. More power to him, and a pox on those who know he's right and are silent.....
  • greeneyedgemini said 2 years ago
    [THUMBUP]
  • bigbob47 said 2 years ago
    As far as a democratic front runner Feingold should be the man. Although I am conservative, and I feel John McCain is the right man for the job, Feingold has the integrity and true love for this country that is lacking from Hillary Clinton, or John Kerry. I disagree with him on elements of the patriot act, and I think he is wrong for putting Bush on trial in the court of public opinion for his own political gain. His only problems running for office will be his election campaign funding, and the razor sharp contempt of Hillary Rodham Clinton.
  • Ancient1 said 2 years ago
    LT, I thought you quit drinking?
  • blueallymissey said 2 years ago
    we DID need to trust the dubai port deal. how come know one was up in arms about great britain operating our ports? im against ANY foreign country operating our ports but i hate the liberal hypocrisy that came from the current port deal.
    im not a fan of bush but the guy had a point. we cant alienate our allies. isnt that what democrats preach?
    bush is not the best president by far but feingold was just grandstanding, trying to make a name for himself (it seems all politicians do that nowadays) i like mcCain (as much as i like any politician) because hes sensible and consistent. he doesnt do what is always popular but 9 times out of ten he does what is right and has a willingness to work with the opposing party.
    am i the only one who thinks feingold did this purly for himself and not because he truly believed it? maybe i need a break from my cynicism...[TONGUE]
  • blueallymissey said 2 years ago
    ancient1...i didnt meant to reply to your comment but just post...sorry.
  • longthought said 2 years ago
    [LOL][LOL][COOL][LOL][LOL]
  • Strider333 said 2 years ago
    [LOL][LOL][LOL]
  • redwolftimes said 2 years ago
    Even the most noble of ideas can turn to dust in the blink of an eye. We are now at that point..
  • grumpy said 2 years ago
    What is that sound--oh its all his fellow Dems running away from him. I admire a man of integerity even if I don't agree.
  • longthought said 2 years ago
    Sad but true. But never underestimate the power of the people. If they stand up for Fienfold and get heard the spineless one just might have to at least take a stand.[COOL]
  • utopia said 2 years ago
    [KISS][ROLLEYES][HEART]
  • longthought said 2 years ago
    [COOL][COOL][COOL]
  • utopia said 2 years ago
    [COOL][COOL][COOL][COOL][WINK]
  • vitriolaholic said 2 years ago
    [HUH]
  • utopia said 2 years ago
    [WINK]
  • Strider333 said 2 years ago
    Russ and John...tell your parties to go to hell and run as Independents...[THUMBUP][THUMBUP]
  • Ancient1 said 2 years ago
    LT,

    Please, note that not all of these comments are coming from behind the cheedar curtain. But, hey you've got a quorum for a focus group, Feingold '08, eh?

  • longthought said 2 years ago
    Hmmm, Interesting point.[COOL]
  • Ancient1 said 2 years ago
    Okay... I've thrown out a couple of drive-by comments and couldn't strike a nerve. So, allow me one serious comment on my observations on the topic.

    Feingold didn't receive open support from his Demo Senate colleagues, but they didn't go out of their way to distance themselves from him either. Some, like Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and Chuck Schumer, were simply too afraid to weigh in without the advice of their pollsters. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist dismissed the move as pure politics and called Feingold's bluff by moving for a vote. Senate Demos pulled the censure, and it will most likely die a quiet death. Nonetheless, Feingold has reminded the country just how weak he and his fellow Democrats are on the issue of national security.

    It's not so much the senator's integrity as his judgment that's in question here. After all, ironically, Feingold was the lone Senate Democrat with the courage (read: gonads) to vote for conviction in the impeachment trial of Bill Clinton.


    Like your blog LT.
    Keep the faith
  • longthought said 2 years ago
    It's hard to rile me when what you you say is true. He was the lone to stand up and vote against Bill Clinton. He's a man of principles. I rather certain his efforts will fall short, but it is an opportunity to show some force in the party. Some balls that have been sorely lacking for far too long. Feingold stands more on principles than on politics I find that rather refreshing and I'm keeping score to see who gets on board.[COOL]
  • Percivel said 2 years ago
    "Some, like Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and Chuck Schumer, were simply too afraid to weigh in without the advice of their pollsters"

    Nice editorializing. Rhetorical BS, but nicely done.

Add a comment

To add comments without entering your email and image verification, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster

  • Type the words in the box below the image.

Email this blog post to a friend

To email posts to friends, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster

Friends

View All